SYDNEY, Australia — After months of debate and delay, the Australian government on Tuesday promised to reach”net zero” emissions by 2050, unveiling a plan built on hope and investment in low emissions technologies.
Promising jobs and no new taxes of mandates, the plan did not contain hardening of emissions targets for 2030 — an important part of what scientists have said will be needed from world leaders at next to soften UN Climate Summit in Glasgow. Despite of international Busy, Australia indicated it would not withdraw from his over-dependence on coal and gas.
Both play an important role in Australian power grid and as subsidized exports. According to the plan released Tuesday, which Prime Minister Scott Morrison called “uniquely Australian”, die dependence on fossil fuels will continue, prompting us critics to claim that he will arrive in Scotland for the climate meeting with an outdated status quo packed up in new packaging.
“This is a update on the marketing materials used by the federal government to claim it does something when it actually does nothing newsaid Richie Merzian, climate and energy director at the Australian Institute, a progressive research organization. “His kind of ridiculous.”
Australia emits less than 2 . from percent of global greenhouse gases, but the climate decisions carry considerable weight because it is a coal superpower and the worldthe third largest exporter of fossil fuels. At the same time, the country is becoming increasingly vulnerable to global pre workout. Since 1910, the average surface temperature in Australia has warmed up to 1.4 degrees Celsius, exceeds the global average. Fires, droughts and cyclones have all become more frequent and severe.
If the temperature persists on their current trajectory, that’s what world leaders who to have made more ambitious commitments focus on: avoid, Australia will see major ecosystem loss in its oceans, higher food prices from severe drought and hundreds of thousands of coastal properties put on risk from flooding, climatologists say.
Mr Morrison did not mention these risks when he appeared on Tuesday in Canberra, the capital city, to put his plan together met To introduce Angus Taylor, the minister for industry, energy and emission reduction.
Mr Morrison said Australia was… on to defeat the purpose of the Paris Agreement, cutting emissions met 30 to 35 percent by 2030, largely because farmers, consumers and businesses have opted for more efficient, cleaner options, such as solar power. He insisted that the “Australian” way” offered a model for the world because it would be built on several principles, including “technology, no taxes” and “choices, no mandates”.
resounding on times like he was already campaigning — Australia next federal elections are scheduled for May of next year — he said the government would be 20 billion Australian dollar ($15 billion) to invest in the use of low emissions technologies, such as sun, wind and green hydrogen made of splitting water with electricity from renewable energy. There would also to be financial support for the low emission production of steel and aluminum.
Already met already, according to the published plan, 70 percent of the expected emission reductions die are needed to net zero by 2050 would come from technology in one form of another.
Critics described that as mostly magical thinking – especially since Australia’s attempt to achieve net zero would also Involving support for hydrogen made of fossil fuels, die emit large amounts of carbon, mee with rarely tested technologies like carbon capture and storage, where carbon is trapped underground. Both can be read as a different form of staff for the already-powerful coal and gas industry.
And when asked cutting back on gas exploration of power plants die use fossil fuels, Mr Morrison stressed that the plan would create jobs in would protect the whole country.
In a statement published for the news conference, he said more simply: “We want our heavy industries, like mining, to stay open, remain be competitive and adapt so that they remain viable for as long as global demand allows.”
In other words, critics argued, Australia’s official policy is still delay, no obligation.
Terry Hughes, a climate scientist who leads a center for coral reef studies at James Cook University, said if Australia took climate change seriously, it would ban it new coal mines and gas fields instead of encourage them.
“A promise, with no legislation, to reach’net’ zero by 2050 is meaningless,” he said. “It’s far too little and far too late.”
“The plan”, he said added, “is a missed opportunity die each real action on reduce emissions.”
Read More: World News
Denial of any Responsibility!
AsumeTech is a News Source that Publishes News from its Editorial Team and the Automatic News Aggregation around the News Media. All the Aggregated Content you find on our site is available freely over the Internet; each piece of Content includes the hyperlink to its Primary Source. We have just arranged that in our platform for Educational Purposes only. All the Copyrights and Trademarks belong to their Rightful Owners and all Materials to their Authors. If you are the Content owner and do not want us to publish your materials on our Website, please get in touch with us by email – [email protected]; we will remove the Content from our Website.