Is Anna Karenina the Worst Adaptation of a Classic Novel?

As the camera pans over the sweeping landscapes of 19th-century Russia, viewers are drawn into a world of passion, betrayal, and societal constraints. Anna Karenina, a 2012 adaptation of Leo Tolstoy’s timeless novel, attempts to unravel this intricate tapestry, but what unfolds on screen left many disappointed. With an ensemble cast featuring Keira Knightley as the titular character and Aaron Taylor-Johnson as her love interest, Count Vronsky, the film promised much but delivered less than expected, leaving audiences bewildered and critics borderline scathing.

Directed by Joe Wright, renowned for his work on period dramas like Pride and Prejudice and Atonement, the film had all the ingredients for success. The haunting performances of established actors such as Jude Law and the likes of supermodel Cara Delevingne added further intrigue. However, despite the star power, the adaptation was met with a barrage of negative reviews, with some viewers labeling it ‘trash.’ A Rotten Tomatoes review encapsulated the overall sentimen“The atmosphere, the feelings—just aren’t there.” It’s clear that an understanding of the cultural backdrop is essential when translating a Russian classic to the screen.

With a modest score of 63% on Rotten Tomatoes, Anna Karenina found itself criticized more than it had hoped. Yet, it’s important to acknowledge that the film did secure an Academy Award and a BAFTA for its stunning costume design, showcasing the visual splendor that captured the essence of a bygone era. Critics often remarked that while the aesthetics were lush, the performances of the leads struggled to resonate emotionally with the audience. One review note“Keira Knightley and Aaron Taylor-Johnson’s dry performances do little to elevate a truncated and emotionally flat Anna Karenina.”

The film’s narrative weaves the tragic story of Anna, an aristocratic woman ensnared in a loveless marriage to senior statesman Alexei Karenin. As her passionate affair with Count Vronsky blooms, it sparks scandal and ultimately leads to her isolation, driving the narrative toward its heartbreaking conclusion. A viewer’s comment harshly criticized the film, stating, “What a monumental piece of trash, and such an incredible amount of talent wasted.” Herein lies the dichotomy of the filstunning visuals contrasted with a narrative perceived as emotionally hollow.

Another viewer lamented, “Amazing directing, but oh my god, the plot didn’t hit at all.” They pointed out the excessive foreshadowing involving trains and a noticeable lack of chemistry between Anna and Vronsky. In fact, some even found themselves more engaged by the side characters, with Matthew Macfadyen and Domhnall Gleeson garnering more appreciation than the leads.

Despite its mixed reception, Anna Karenina offers a unique cinematic experience worth exploring for its artistry. Its vivid costume design and striking cinematography create a visually arresting world that can be appreciated even if the story itself falters. For those interested in immersing themselves in this theatrical interpretation, the film is available for streaming on Amazon Prime. However, if you’re on the lookout for a period drama that aligns more closely with audience expectations, Joe Wright’s other films, such as Oppenheimer, might be more satisfying.