Google warned of a devastating impact on the Internet if a court ruling holding the search giant responsible for the defamatory material posted on the pages web was not overturned.
The company warned in a US Supreme Court filing that in future may have to censor his research findings if attorney George Deferos were allowed to collect $ 40,000 in defamation damages.
Deferos managed to file a lawsuit against Google. He argued that his publication of the research findings, which included an article published in 2004 about his arrest on suspicion of conspiring to kill the defendant, made him famous.
Additionally, Supreme Court Justice Melinda Richards ruled in 2020 that the article implied that Deferos had morphed from a professional attorney. in friend and confidant of criminal elements.
The Victoria Court of Appeal rejected Google’s request to overturn the conclusion. Detteros’ lawyers contacted the research firm in 2016 asking for the article to be removed. But Google refused on the grounds that the source of the article is trustworthy.
Additionally, Google’s attorneys told the Supreme Court that the notice contained false allegations that Deferos had sued in judging the source of the article for defamation and that the source of the article had agreed to remove it from their site web, according to the Arab Technical News Portal.
Google has warned that it may be responsible as the publisher of any material posted on the web whose search results provide a hyperlink.
Additionally, the tech company said it was not posting the material because the hyperlink does not in itself represent a transfer of what it is linked to.
Google said websites should be held accountable if the hyperlink actually repeats the defamatory assumption it is linked to.
It also asked the Court of Cassation to reconsider the defense of the conditional privilege. He said he believed his users had a legitimate interest in accessing the material.
Complaints for defamation
In 2018 the court gave the via free to libel complaints against search engines. Milorad Turkulja mentioned in Google judgment for a series of images and results that it deemed defamatory.
The Supreme Court ruled in September last year in the Dylan Fuller case that users of the social media they are responsible in as publishers for the defamatory comments of third parties about them post on social media.
Read More About: Technology News