reader remarks
83
with 61 posters taking part
AT&T’s decision to avoid Time Warner- owned shows from streaming on Netflix and other non-AT&T services minimized the business’s quarterly profits by $1.2 billion, a sacrifice that AT&T is making to provide its organized HBO Max service more unique material. AT&T took the $1.2-billion struck regardless of formerly informing Congress that it would not limit circulation of Time Warner material, declaring that would be “irrational business behavior.”
AT&T’s real Q4 2019 profits was $468 billion, however the business stated it would have been $48 billion if not for “HBO Max investments in the form of foregone WarnerMedia content licensing revenues.”
An AT&T representative told Ars that the $1.2 billion in lost profits was mostly brought on by the decision “not to sell existing content—mainly Friends, The Big Bang Theory, and Fresh Prince—to third parties such as Netflix.” As we have actually formerly reported, AT&T took Time Warner shows off Netflix in order to provide the unique streaming rights to AT&T’s HBO Max, which is arranged to debut in May 2020 for $1499 a month.
“We made the strategic decision to give HBO Max exclusive streaming rights for top programs, including Friends, Big Bang Theory, and other popular shows. In the past, we would have sold these externally,” AT&T CFO John Stephens stated in an incomes call.
The quantity of forgone profits might grow in future quarters, as Pals simply left Netflix on January 1. The Big Bang Theory and Fresh Prince were not on Netflix in the United States, so in those cases the forgone profits is obviously from not participating in licensing offers rather of ending them. AT&T likewise pulled Pretty Little Liars off Netflix in mid-2019 in order to provide HBO Max the unique streaming rights.
AT&T in 2016: “It would be irrational”
AT&T won a lawsuit permitting it to finish its purchase of Time Warner in June 2018 after informing Congress that it would not do exactly what it is now doing with Time Warner- owned shows.
In December 2016, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson told a Senate antitrust subcommittee that AT&T would continue to disperse Time Warner material as commonly as possible rather of restricting it to AT&T’s own platforms:
Nor is there any factor to think we might utilize Time Warner programs or AT&T networks to injure associated markets. Basically, it would be unreasonable business habits to do so. When dispersed to as numerous eyes as possible, Time Warner’s programs is more important. In order to have excellent programs, it is vital that we attract excellent imaginative skill to establish it. The very best method to attract that skill is through extensive circulation of Time Warner material.
Time Warner business “depends on licensing”
AT&T made comparable claims to a federal judge in the lawsuit in which AT&T beat the Department of Justice’s effort to obstruct the merger. The claims in court filings were more directly minimal to content owned by Turner Broadcasting, among the main pieces of Time Warner along with HBO and Warner Bros. (Pals, The Big Bang Theory, Fresh Prince, and Pretty Little Liars are all Warner Bros. shows.)
In a Might 2018 court filing, AT&T declared that the “real-world economics of the programming business” negated the DOJ’s case that AT&T would keep video material from other suppliers in order to increase its own TELEVISION services:
Turner’s whole business depends upon licensing and marketing earnings, and those earnings in turn depend upon continuous and broad circulation of itsprograms Whatever earnings AT&T would make from the small portion of customers AT&T [TV services] may acquire if Turner went dark on a competing supplier would be greatly overtaken by the licensing and marketing earnings Turner would lose. Turner, appropriately, would no faster ignore this “kabuki dance” after the merger than in the past– and everybody understands it.
AT&T court filings likewise promoted its binding pledge to utilize “baseball-style” arbitration to settle any licensing disagreements over Turner material with suppliers. While that promise will limit AT&T’s habits with Turner, AT&T’s treatment of Pals and other Warner Bros. shows appears to oppose Stephenson’s claim to Congress that “Time Warner’s programming is more valuable when distributed to as many eyes as possible.”
AT&T likewise raised costs of its TELEVISION services several times after stating in a court filing that purchasing Time Warner would “enable the merged company to reduce prices.”
Warner Bros. profits dropped 8 percent
AT&T stated its Warner Bros. quarterly profits was $4.1 billion, down 8 percent year-over-year partially due to the decision to quit licensing profits from Netflix and other streaming services. AT&T’s Turner division– which is based on the arbitration pledge– had quarterly profits of $3.3 billion, “up 1.6 percent year over year due to a 3.1 percent increase in subscription revenues and a 7.3 percent increase in content licensing and other revenues, partially offset by a 2 percent decline in advertising revenues.”
Quiting $1.2 billion in quarterly profits is obviously worth it to AT&T since of how important HBO Max is to its TELEVISION strategies. In addition to purchasing Time Warner for $85 billion, AT&T bought DirecTV for $485 billion in July2015 The business’s TELEVISION business has actually cratered, with AT&T losing more than 4 million consumers from its satellite, wireline, and direct streaming-TV services in 2019.
HBO Max, which will bring HBO content together with other Time Warner video, consisting of shows previously offered on Netflix, is expected to resolve AT&T’s TELEVISION troubles. AT&T states it’s intending to get 50 million United States customers within 5 years for its Netflix-style service– and unique streaming rights to shows that would otherwise be on Netflix will be a big part of AT&T’s pitch to consumers.
